RadonEye Bluetooth shielding cap

More than 20,000 satisfied customers

39,00 €

incl. 19% VAT , plus

Manufacturers recommended retail price: 49,00 €

(Save 20.41%, i.e. 10,00 €)

The RadonTec Bluetooth shielding cover was specially developed for the RadonEye and reduces interference from Bluetooth signals to ensure even more precise measurements.

Effective shielding of Bluetooth signals
Perfect fit for the RadonEye measuring device
Easy installation and handling
High-quality materials for a long service life
Ideal for professional radon measurements

Available immediately
Delivery time: 2 - 3 Workdays (DE - int. shipments may differ)

Description
Reviews

Bluetooth shielding Hood for RadonEye

The RadonEye Bluetooth shielding hood manufactured by RadonTec is made with a special electromagnetic shielding, still radon permeable, fabric. The fabric has a shielding power of ~40db. This attenuates the Bluetooth radiation by about 85%. Thus, communication with the smartphone is still possible, although only at a very short distance.

If there are communication problems with the smartphone, the hood must be removed for a short time to read out the radon values. However, the hood has no influence on the radon measurement.

Average item rating

All reviews:

How do reviews work?

Total entries: 2

für meine Frau
die will keine Bluetooth Strahlung im Schlafzimmer haben, okay Haube drüber und schon ist safer Radon Messen möglich ;)

Florian M , 11.10.2020 Verified purchase

funktioniert super
bin kein großer Freund von permanenten elektromagnetsichen Strahlen. Darum hab ich mir diese Kappe, für das Radoneye welches ja permanent Bluetooth strahlt, gekauft.
Hab mit einem Giaghertz Messgerät gemssen, reduziert die Bluetooth Strahlung erheblich.
Der Radonshop Support hat mir ausführlich erklärt, warum die Radonmessung dadurch nicht beeindrächtigt wird. Klang sehr logisch, für Radon ist dieser luftdurchlässige Stoff quasi nicht existent. Wenn man überlegt, dass Radon sogar durch Wasserdichte materialien durchdringen kann, klingt die Aussage logisch.

Somit 5 Sterne

Woflgang M , 15.12.2019